Comparison of Wind Drift and Evaporation Losses and Performance Evaluation Indices in Three Sprinkler Irrigation Systems with Emphasis on Water Resource Sustainability (Case Study: Poldasht County)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, West Azerbaijan Province Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Urmia, Iran

2 Rice Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran.

10.22034/hws.2026.70065.1036

Abstract

Introduction
Water is the most critical and limiting input for agricultural production in Iran, where severe water scarcity poses substantial threats to food security and sustainable agriculture. Factors such as population growth, prolonged droughts, and the over-extraction of water resources have intensified the water crises across the country, leading to adverse social and economic consequences. Given that over 90% of the country’s renewable water resources are consumed in the agriculture sector, optimizing irrigation efficiency through the adoption of modern irrigation technologies has become an urgent necessity. Efficient water management not only conserves scarce resources but also enhances crop yield and mitigates environmental impacts. In this context, the present study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the performance of three sprinkler irrigation systems, namely the conventiona gun sprinklers, the spray boom, and a farmer-modified water distribution system, under field conditions along the Aras River in Poldasht, West Azerbaijan, Iran. The objective was to provide a detailed comparison of these systems in terms of water distribution uniformity, Christiansen’s uniformity coefficient (CU), application efficiency (Ea), and losses due to evaporation and wind drift. By systematically assessing these performance indicators, the research aimed to identify the most effective and sustainable irrigation method for semi-arid agricultural regions, where water scarcity and environmental challenges render efficient irrigation practices critical for crop productivity and long-term resource management. Furthermore, the study explored the potential of low-cost, site-specific modifications implemented in the farmer-designed systems to improve water use efficiency and reduce operational losses. The findings are intended to offer practical insights for optimizing irrigation strategies in similar agro-climatic zones.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted on 59 hectares of privately owned farmland characterized by sandy loam soil, located in a semi-arid cold climate in Poldasht, West Azerbaijan, Iran. The site is situated along the Aras River at an elevation of 874 meters above sea level. Field experiments were carried out during July, August, and September 2018 to evaluate the performance of three sprinkler irrigation systems. The assessment focused on key performance indicators including distribution uniformity (DU), Christiansen’s uniformity coefficient (CU), application efficiency (Ea), and losses due to evaporation and wind drift. To quantify water distribution, catch cans were strategically placed in multiple rows across the irrigation strips, and the overlapping effects of adjacent irrigation lines were incorporated into the calculations to accurately determine the actual water depth received at each location. Soil physical and chemical properties, including texture, bulk density, infiltration rate, pH, and electrical conductivity, were analyzed to understand their influence on water movement and retention. Water quality parameters were also measured to ensure suitability for irrigation. Additionally, the farmer-designed system was adjusted and optimized under field conditions, Modifications included alterations to lateral pipes and nozzle configurations aimed at improving water application uniformity and reducing operational losses.
Results and Discussion
The results of the field evaluation revealed significant differences in performance among the three sprinkler irrigation systems. The spray boom system demonstrated the highest efficiency and uniformity, with average Christiansen’s uniformity coefficient (CU), distribution uniformity (DU), and application efficiency (Ea) of 94.7%, 91.1%, and 85.8%, respectively, indicating excellent irrigation performance. In contrast, the gun sprinkler system exhibited the lowest performance, with CU = 68.7%, DU = 64.9%, and Ea =67.6%, and recorded the highest evaporation and wind drift losses, averaging 22.7%. These performance variations were largely attributed to factors such as spray height, droplet size, and wind conditions, which significantly influenced water distribution and losses under field conditions. The farmer- modified water distribution system, which incorporated on-farm modifications including direct water application via lateral pipes and te removal of standard nozzles, achieved an acceptable performance level with CU = 89.9%, DU = 85.7%, and Ea = 94.2%. Evaporation and wind losses were negligible in this system due to the reduced exposure of water droplets to the atmosphere. The data further indicated that overlapping of irrigation lines played a critical role in achieving more uniform water distribution, particularly for the spray boom and gun sprinkler systems. Overall, the findings underscore the importance of system design, operational adjustments, and site-specific adaptations in achieving high irrigation efficiency and minimizing water losses.
Conclusion
The study demonstrated that the type of sprinkler irrigation system, along with its design and operational practices, has a decisive influence on water distribution uniformity, application efficiency, and losses due to evaporation and wind drift. Among the three systems evaluated, the spray boom system exhibited superior performance, achieving excellent uniformity and efficiency, whereas the gun sprinkler system showed the poorest results, primarily due to higher droplet height and susceptibility to wind. The farmer-designed water distribution system, despite being developed empirically, performed effectively, underscoring the potential of low-cost, site-specific modifications to enhance irrigation efficiency. These findings indicate that adopting spray boom systems or modified on-farm water distribution methods can substantially improve irrigation efficiency, reduce water losses, and promote sustainable water management in semi-arid and windy regions. Moreover, periodic evaluation of system performance and installation of proper filtration to prevent nozzle clogging are essential for maintaining long-term efficiency and reliability. Overall, this study offers practical insights for optimizing sprinkler irrigation practices and encourages the adoption of cost-effective, farmer-adapted solutions in water-scarce regions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Abedinpour M, 2017. Field evaluation of centre pivot sprinkler irrigation system in the North-East of Iran. Journal of Water and Land Development, 34(1): 3-9, https://doi.org/10.1515/jwld-2017-0033.
  • Ahmadaali K, Ramezani Etedali H and Hosseini Pazhouh N, 2017. Assessment of modern irrigation systems in Qom province. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 11(5): 736-749 [In Persian with English Abstract].
  • Ahmadzadeh Kaleybar F and Emamifar M, 2023. Technical evaluation of classic stationary sprinkler irrigation systems with travelling sprinklers (Komet 162) in Arasbaran plain of development lands for irrigation. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 13(13): 148-162, https://doi.org/10.22125/iwe.2022.326264.1595. [In Persian with English Abstract].
  • Ashiri M, Hooshmand A and Broomand nasab S, 2016. Technical evaluation of drip irrigation systems (case study: Shahid Rajaayi agro-industry - Dezful). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 39(2): 79-88, https://doi.org/10.22055/jise.2016.12113 [In Persian with English Abstract].
  • Bakhtiari S, Mohseni Movahed SA, Moghaddasi M and Davoudmaghami D, 2020. Performance evaluation of semi-portable sprinkler irrigation systems in Markazi province. Iranian Water Researches Journal, 14(1): 9-18 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Bellvert J, Pamies-Sans M, Casadesus J and Girona J, 2025. Evaluating the impact of drought and water restrictions on agricultural production in irrigated areas through crop water productivity functions and a remote sensing-based evapotranspiration model. Agricultural Water Management, 309: 109319. https://doi.org/1016/j.agwat.2025.109319
  • Doust Mohammadi MM, Soltani Mohammadi A and Boroomand Nasab S, 2016. The performance evaluation of travelling gun irrigation system implemented in Esmatyeh farm of Qom. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 38(4): 47-61. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25885952.1394.38.4.5.6 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Gholami Sefidkouhi MA, Doust Mohammadi MM and Heydari S, 2024. Technical, economical and social evaluation of localized irrigation systems in Qom province. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 18(5): 745-757, [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Ghorbani B and Amini M, 2011. Assessment of sprinkler irrigation systems operation at Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province, Iran. ICID 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, Tehran, Iran.
  • Heydari N and Nakhjavani Moghadam M, 2024. Quantitate evaluation of pressurized irrigation development in Iran compared to the world. Water Management in Agriculture, 10(2): 171-194, [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Karimi M and Jolaini M, 2016. Guidelines for evaluation of center pivot irrigation system performance (technical note). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 2(2): 85-91, https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v2i2.42900 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Karlberg L and de Vries FWP, 2004. Exploring potentials and constraints of low-cost drip irrigation with saline water in sub-Saharan Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 29(15-18): 1035-1042, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2004.08.004
  • Keller J and Bliesner R, 1990. Sprinkler and trickle irrigation. Van Nosrand Remholh, New York, 652 p.
  • Keramatzadeh A, Khosravi Payam V and Joolaie R, 2020. The impact of water pricing method on agricultural water consumption in Gonbad Kavoos county. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 27(2): 179-194, https://doi.org/10.22069/jwsc.2020.16797.3213. [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Li L, Zhang X, Qiao X and Liu G, 2016. Analysis of the decrease of center pivot sprinkling system uniformity and its impact on maize yield. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 9(4): 108-119, 10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.1129
  • Mateos L, 2006. A simulation study of comparison of the evaluation procedures for three irrigation methods. Irrigation Science, 25(1): 75-83, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0036-x
  • Mohamed AZ, Peters RT, Zhu X and Sarwar A, 2019. Adjusting irrigation uniformity coefficients for unimportant variability on a small scale. Agricultural Water Management, 213: 1078-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.017
  • Mohammadi E, Naghdi MH, Kahnooji M and Atrchian H, 2025. Evaluation of the performance of drip irrigation systems in Pistachio Orchards (study area: Pistachio Orchards covered by the SIMAB project in Kerman province). Irrigation and Water Engineering, 15(3): 72-88, https://doi.org/10.22125/iwe.2025.450605.1799 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Naseri A, Abbasi F and Akbari M, 2017. Estimating agricultural water consumption by analyzing water balance. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 18(68): 17-32, https://doi.org/10.22092/aridse.2017.105338.1057 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Nazari S, Bijenkhan M, Ramezani Etedali H and Mahdavi A, 2024. Evaluating the effect of the discharge control valve implementation in tape irrigation systems. Hydraulics and Water Science, 34(4): 39-51, https://doi.org/10.22034/hws.2024.18667 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Ngasoh FG, Anyadike CC, Mbajiorgu CC and Usman MN, 2018. Performance evaluation of sprinkler irrigation system at Mambilla beverage limited, Kakara-Gembu, Taraba State-Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37(1): 268-274, https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i1.35
  • Peng J, Liu T, Chen J, Li Z, Ling Y, De Wulf A and De Maeyer P, 2023. The conflicts of agricultural water supply and demand under climate change in a typical arid land watershed of Central Asia. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 47: 101384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101384
  • Rahimzadegan R, 1997. Design of sprinkler irrigation system. Isfahan University of Technology Publications, 280 p [In Persian].
  • Rouzaneh D, Yazdanpanah M and Jahromi AB, 2021. Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers' satisfaction: implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management, 246: 106655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106655
  • Salamati N, Moayeri M and Abbasi F, 2023. Evaluation of canola yield and applied water productivity in surface and sprinkler irrigation systems (case study: Behbahan). Journal of Water and Soil Science, 27(2): 1-18, https://doi.org/0.47176/jwss.27.2.26989 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Salemi HR, Rezvani SM, Ghadami Firouzabadi A and EbrahimiPak NA, 2020. Investigation and evaluation of sprinkler irrigation systems (constant classic and wheel move) in some fields of Isfahan and Hamedan provinces. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 10(3): 277-288, https://doi.org/10.22125/iwe.2020.107110 [In Persian with English Abstrac].
  • Seyedzadeh A, Khazaee P, Siosemardeh A and Maroufpoor E, 2022. Irrigation management evaluation of multiple irrigation methods using performance indicators. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 28(3): 303-312, https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2021.1891470
  • Silva LL, Serralheiro R and Santos N, 2007. Improving irrigation performance in hose-drawn traveller sprinkler systems. Biosystems Engineering, 96(1): 121-127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.10.004
  • Srivastava RC, Mohanty S, Singandhuppe RB, Mohanty RK, Behera MS, Ray LI and Sahoo D, 2010. Feasibility evaluation of pressurized irrigation in canal commands. Water Resources Management, 24(12): 3017-3032, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9592-1
  • Wigginton DW and Raine SR, 2001. Irrigation water use efficiency in the Mary River catchment on-farm performance evaluations in the dairy sector. National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture publication, 179729(3): 254-270, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131826
  • Zamanisepahvand S, Torabi H and Nasrolahi A, 2023. Estimation of wind drift and evaporation losses of sprinkler irrigation systems under the influence of different exploitation managements (case study: Choghahoroshi Khorramabad plain). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 17(1): 129-141, https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20087942.1402.17.1.11.5 [In Persian with English Abstrac].